Wed May 25, 2011 8:49 am by 45Brit
The rear drive is just wrong. It's an underslung bevel which wears very quickly and is a severe constraint in the maximum power possible for the machine. The early models also suffered from severe vibration, hence the rubber engine mounts and the flexible section in the exhaust.
It was designed by a designer more accustomed to car engines, and it shows; a pity because in some ways it's a very advanced design and had a solid marketing name behind it.
However BMW had done their homework, their post-war designs were much better than the Sunbeam and their R69 ( produced from 1955 ) was everything the Sunbeam tried to be, but wasn't. It's doubly ironic that BSA actually based the Sunbeam, supposedly, on BMW designs they had inherited under War Reparations - but how you start with a BMW and end up with a Sunbeam, I couldn't rightly say.
This was also a time when BSA produced the Bantam from the same basic bike that Harley developed the Hummer from, and the British motor industry turned down the VW Beetle as too unsightly and difficult to make and sell, so there were plenty of dud decisions made around then...
Mongo only pawn in game of life