FAQ  •  Register  •  Login

SportScout valve specs question

Moderators: Curt!, Pa

<<

Cotten

User avatar

Posts: 2685

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 1999 12:01 am

Location: Central Illinois, USA

Post Thu May 02, 2002 2:00 pm

SportScout valve specs question

I have no printed literature for SportScouts; Is the valvestem to guide tolerance smaller than Chiefs?

Since they are .340" stems instead of .375", I have been considering setting them up tight at .0035" on the intakes and .004" on the exhausts, mostly because there is enough meat in the new guides to do so.

Can anyone quote the Wigwam?
Thanks in advance.....
<<

HOOTER

Posts: 1319

Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2001 1:01 am

Location: State College, Pa.

Post Thu May 02, 2002 3:39 pm

Cotton

In the Q/A book, Indian 45 and 74 Military Models. Listed:

Valve stem diameter----------.339"
Valve guide hole diameter----.344"

.005" clearance

30.50 and the 841 show the same clearance

HOOT
<<

Guy Winton III

Posts: 108

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 1999 1:01 am

Location: San Diego

Post Fri May 03, 2002 2:42 am

My 741 Manual lists 0.338 and 0.343...dunno why Unkle Franks is different.
<<

Dusty-Dave

Posts: 902

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 1999 12:01 am

Location: Ojo Caliente,NM,USA

Post Fri May 03, 2002 3:04 am

Cotten:
TM-10-1485 as reprinted by Pierce motor company states stems should measure .338 and be replaced if worn smaller than .333 and guides should be .343 and replaced if over .350
Dusty
<<

HOOTER

Posts: 1319

Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2001 1:01 am

Location: State College, Pa.

Post Fri May 03, 2002 4:55 am

So regardless of discrepencies your aiming for .005" clearance for an as new dimension.
<<

Cotten

User avatar

Posts: 2685

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 1999 12:01 am

Location: Central Illinois, USA

Post Fri May 03, 2002 2:33 pm

Thanks for the clues.

The KIWI valves are nice and fat, probably the hardchrome, although it appears to be more than a "flash" of a thou.

If this were my own project, I would set it up tighter, just 'cos I could. I have come to beleive that lots of fits are spec'd as loose as a goose just for "idiot factor".
<<

Boogiemanz1

Posts: 896

Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2000 1:01 am

Location: Bixby,OK, USA

Post Fri May 03, 2002 4:32 pm

I know what you mean Cotten, I hate to put something together that feels 1/2 worn out at the start. I'd set mine tighter, but on a customer bike I guess I'd have to know how he intended to ride it.

------------------
When you're riding lead--don't spit.
<<

Guy Winton III

Posts: 108

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 1999 1:01 am

Location: San Diego

Post Fri May 03, 2002 8:57 pm

so how tight do you guys think cast iron guides and chrome stems can be set (or other combos)?
<<

Boogiemanz1

Posts: 896

Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2000 1:01 am

Location: Bixby,OK, USA

Post Sat May 04, 2002 5:10 am

I don't know, if it were mine and a sidevalve I'd probably go about.0035 on intake and exhaust, but that would be with honed guides (which hold lube better IMHO) and a good stainless or nitrided valve, and every thing right.....and no vacuum leaks! LOL
<<

HOOTER

Posts: 1319

Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2001 1:01 am

Location: State College, Pa.

Post Sat May 04, 2002 6:14 am

I,myself, would stay away from tight tolerances on the sidevalve mainly because the lubrcant has to go uphill instead of down hill as on an ohv engine. Honed guides can be fitted tighter because of their oil retention capability due to the cross hatch. But I wouldn't want to fit them any closer than a .001" lower than the stock specs. I would guenea pig it on my own engine before some one elses. At least if it doesn't work, the piston won't smack it if it sticks.

Never cared for the chromed stainless in castiron guides. Prefer the nitrided valves or if using uncoated valves. I bead blast and cook a moly coat on to them.

HOOT
<<

Cotten

User avatar

Posts: 2685

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 1999 12:01 am

Location: Central Illinois, USA

Post Sat May 04, 2002 12:27 pm

Hoot!
I agree that stainless valves in castiron guides is not optimum, but that's what the customer dropped off. At least there is some chrome in between.

My preference is Kibblewhites' for Chiefs, but I never asked them to make any SS valves yet.
<<

HOOTER

Posts: 1319

Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2001 1:01 am

Location: State College, Pa.

Post Sat May 04, 2002 3:42 pm

I'm adverse to using chrome plated stainless valves in iron because I've seen on numerous occasions where the chrome wore off and the stems had heavy galling. Probably because of angularity the valves are pushed by the rocker arm movement. Stainless galls easily so it needs a different wear surface.

I prefer Kibble's Black Diamond or Rowe's Black Melonite valves myself. I would only use the chrome valves with Ampco45 material guides if I had to use them.

Being that there are no side loads on the valve stem in a flathead and the demands that the customer just has to have this valve/guide combo. I would fit them at .005" minimum. And tell him no warrantry against valve seizure.

Aren't your Indian Kibblewhite valves impregnated stainless? Check them with a magnet.

HOOT
<<

Boogiemanz1

Posts: 896

Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2000 1:01 am

Location: Bixby,OK, USA

Post Sat May 04, 2002 6:16 pm

When I port "the other" harley engines, I use kibblewhite guides if a lift of over .530 is involved. I really like the black diamond valves,which I think are nitrided stainless, are great. They will build your valves out of anything on request, and special order aren't that high. I have had them build oversize guides for me to repair wallowed out aluminum heads, this way the seats don't shift from the heat of welding.

Cotten, just for your info, Jim's just came out with their ovn line (Advanced Valve and Valvetrain) valves and guides.....I knew you would want to know....I'm ducking and running...jb

Return to Indians

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007, 2012 phpBB Group.