Mon Aug 04, 2008 6:00 am by Pa
Good point. I'd rather that be the reasoning. Cosmetic issue or great alibi. Works either way. What hit me hardest on the report was how the dealerships had no clue about the date coding, nor did they know of the shelf life expectancy. Note how the rep here in the states denied the safety issue, yet, some nations recognized the issue, to the extent, they issued law. I'll be putting new fronts on my Merc today. The dealer I will be using only does tires. He probably sells the most rubber in this county. I'm curious if he has knowledge of that report. I'm also curious to find out how old the rubber will be, that he intends to provide me in options. He moves a huge amount of tires daily. His stock should be fresh, based on the number of tires he sells. Our local, county, and state authorities buy from him. If by chance, the tire options I will be presented with, turn out to be old stocking, I am confident he had no clue. I know the man as honest. Only ignorance of the shelf life situation, would be the reason with him, if his stock is old. Pa